BREAKING: New DEMOCRAT Bill Allows MALE TEACHERS To Be In LITTLE GIRLS' BATHROOMS


By John Paluska, Founder of The Daily Fodder

Democrat David Cicilline of Rhode Island just introduced a new bill that would allow male teachers to use women's bathrooms if they simply claim another gender. The bill, which is another version of the much-spurned so-called "Equality Act" would "desegregate" bathrooms and allow people to use the bathroom of their choice according to their orientation.

According to the bill's findings, transgender and LGBT individuals have a "constitutional right" to use any public facility of their choice, stating "Regular and ongoing discrimination against LGBTQ people, as well as women, in accessing public accommodations contributes to negative social and economic outcomes, and in the case of public accommodations operated by State and local governments, abridges individuals’ constitutional rights."

A bathroom in a Public School is a public accommodation, and therefore requiring biological males to use men's' bathrooms would violate the Constitution if this law passes. Considering the Congress is Democrat-controlled, there's a good chance the bill will pass.

The bill states:

SEC. 4. DESEGREGATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES.

Section 301(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000b(a)) is amended by inserting “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity),” before “or national origin”.

SEC. 5. DESEGREGATION OF PUBLIC EDUCATION.

    (a) Definitions.—Section 401(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000c(b)) is amended by inserting “(including sexual orientation and gender identity),” before “or national origin”.

    (b) Civil Actions By The Attorney General.—Section 407 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000c–6) is amended, in subsection (a)(2), by inserting “(including sexual orientation and gender identity),” before “or national origin”.

    (c) Classification And Assignment.—Section 410 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 2000c–9) is amended by inserting “(including sexual orientation and gender identity),” before “or national origin”.

 However, the bill doesn't end there. They blatantly state their intentions to continue this into private settings as well, stating "Federal courts have widely recognized that, in enacting the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Congress validly invoked its powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to provide a full range of remedies in response to persistent, widespread, and pervasive discrimination by both private and government actors."

They even have a section in the bill geared toward private institutions:

“SEC. 701A. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

“Section 1106 shall apply to this title except that for purposes of that application, a reference in that section to an ‘unlawful practice’ shall be considered to be a reference to an ‘unlawful employment practice’.”.

    (b) Unlawful Employment Practices.—Section 703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–2) is amended—

        (1) in the section header, by striking “SEX,” and inserting “SEX (INCLUDING SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY),”;

        (2) except in subsection (e), by striking “sex,” each place it appears and inserting “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity),”;

        (3) in subsection (e)(1), by striking “enterprise,” and inserting “enterprise, if, in a situation in which sex is a bona fide occupational qualification, individuals are recognized as qualified in accordance with their gender identity,”; and

        (4) in subsection (h), by striking “sex” the second place it appears and inserting “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity),”.

    (c) Other Unlawful Employment Practices.—Section 704(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–3(b)) is amended—

        (1) by striking “sex,” the first place it appears and inserting “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity),”; and

        (2) by striking “employment.” and inserting “employment, if, in a situation in which sex is a bona fide occupational qualification, individuals are recognized as qualified in accordance with their gender identity.”.

    (d) Claims.—Section 706(g)(2)(A) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (2000e–5(g)(2)(A)) is amended by striking “sex,” and inserting “sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity),”.

LGBT people SHOULD NOT deal with discrimination where their orientation has no bearing on the job position. For instance, an LGBT person should not be declined a job simply because they are gay or transgender if it is a corporate job where their sexual identification is not mandatory for the role. However, when it comes to bathrooms, allowing people to simply go with however they identify allows creeps to molest girls.

This has happened. LITTLE GIRLS HAVE BEEN SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY TRANSGENDERS IN BATHROOMS. The reason for bathroom laws is to keep children safe. How many people would like the idea of men using the bathroom next to little girls? How many people would like the idea of sending their child into the bathroom and then a man walks in afterward and they both come out together.

Little girls often are too traumatized to speak out, so many times these perpetrators get away scot free. 

This law must not be passed in its current form because it allows molesters to molest children in bathrooms.


HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF FAKE NEWS!

SHARE our articles and like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter!




Post a Comment

0 Comments