BREAKING: SUPREME COURT: The KRAKEN Has Hit SCOTUS DOCKET, Has PROOF Of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF FAKE BIDEN VOTES, Dominion System GLITCHES, REMOVAL OF TRUMP VOTES


By John Paluska, Founder of The Daily Fodder

Sidney Powell's "Kraken" has finally made it to the docket of the Supreme Court. The suit is perhaps the strongest collective argument yet against voter fraud. 

It contains the forensic audit done in Michigan that proves systemic voter fraud occurred through the Dominion Voting System tabulation. It also has proof of at least 200,000 FRAUDULENT VOTES cast in the election.

Further, it contains official Georgia elections records that prove the Dominion Voting Systems program's "inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results." In other words, official Georgia election canvassers could not rely on Dominion Voting Systems' software to count the vote because it didn't repeat the same vote totals twice.

The Lawsuit states:

15. The Interim Report shows multiple grave problems with the accuracy and vulnerability to hacking and evidence destruction of the Dominion Voting Systems (“Dominion”) machines used in Antrim County, Michigan. The report is relevant to each of the Related Cases because each of the states in question uses Dominion equipment. The Interim Report vindicates the lengthy opinion and order of Judge Amy Totenberg in Curling v. Raffensperger, 2020 WL 5994029 (N.D. Ga. 10/11/20), which found “extreme” and unacceptable security risks in the Dominion system. Compelling evidence and expert analyses show convincingly that the results of the Dominion system cannot be trusted and should not have been certified.

16. The findings in the Interim Report are consistent with the expert testimony provided by Mr. Ramsland regarding Dominion’s vote manipulation in the Petitioners’ November 25, 2020 complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (the “District Court”) (R 450; 2438), and with his testimony in the Related Cases. Mr. Ramsland concluded in the Georgia case that, for the State of Georgia, “at least 96,000 mail-in ballots were fraudulently cast,” and “136,098 ballots were illegally counted as result of improper manipulation of the Dominion software,” id., each of which is several times larger than former VicePresident [sic] Biden’s margin of victory in Georgia (10,457 votes). Similar anomalies exist in the Related Cases. Among other things, the Complaints in the trial courts and the Petitions to this Court in each of the Related Cases all seek prospective injunctive relief requiring a similar forensic audit of Dominion voting machines.  

17. The Coffee County, Georgia Board of Registration and Elections refused to certify the machine recount election returns on their Dominion systems “given its inability to repeatably duplicate creditable election results.”6 The results of the machine recount report were internally inconsistent and could not be reconciled and were inconsistent with both the election night count and the hand audit.7 The Coffee County BRE analysis confirms the findings of the Interim Report, cited above, that ballots going to adjudication can be changed on a wholesale basis by the operator with no oversight, controls or accountability, an extremely serious vulnerability.

The Kraken has been released, and it's time to audit the vote and cancel out the widespread fraud that tipped the election for Biden.


HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF FAKE NEWS!

SHARE our articles and like our Facebook page and follow us on Twitter!




Post a Comment

41 Comments

  1. Replies
    1. SadIy, the fix is weII and truIy in. The courts don't care if the eIection was a totaI fraud, or if Biden is taking bribes from a host of hostiIe countries. They don't care if the Democrats used and acted upon threats of vioIence. The courts don't care if the DEMS ramped up the scare tactics for the Iast year, or organized vioIent street protests with bIm and Antifa.....the courts don't care about any of that. The courts don't care about the Iaw or the Constitution.....they have proven it repeatedIy by REFUSING to actuaIIy Iook at the evidence presented.

      It won't be the courts who have to fix America; it wiII have to be patriotic Americans who fix america. And they are not to be found in the Democratic party, the media, the courts, or Big Tech. Good Iuck.

      Delete
    2. Agree, Im willing to wait and see, but if it hits Jan 20th and Biden is Inaugurated, then its time for the Patriots to rise up and fix this system by force if needed. When it comes to this point of corruption, its time to clean the slate. We need transparency laws on our politicians, the higher up the food chain the more background information is needed about you, taxes, bank records, birth certificates. We need to make it impossible to become rich as a politician. This is what we need in the MAGA PARTY, if you release all the information about yourself, the opposition has nothing to attack you on but falsehoods. And we gain the ability to attack them on their hidden past. Transparency will cleanse the corruption. This is what is needed in the MAGA PARTY.

      Delete
  2. I want to see Trump re-elected. But where is the proof of these assertions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The report they got Back that the left is pretending to fact check and debunk is legit. They will have to report its validity soon enough

      Delete
    2. You must be deaf dumb and blind to have not seen any proof of an election steal

      Delete
    3. These scumbags commit election fraud and laugh in our faces with "You have no evidence or where is the proof of these assertions" They commit the crime and Trump does the time.
      Then you get McConnell saying "do not try to prove fraud" as the democrats dance all over his face.

      Delete
    4. UPDATE: 12-14-2020 – Read the actual Audit Report: Antrim_michigan_forensics_report_121320_redacted.pdf
      https://www.dropbox.com/s/zberuyi1klkpah3/Antrim_michigan_forensics_report_121320_redacted.pdf?dl=0
      (dropbox.com)

      Delete
    5. I've been thinking about this. Can you prove that a student cheated in school? You might have seen the student looking at another students paper. You might notice that the two papers share the same answers. However, can you PROVE that the student did in fact cheat? What if they were simply stretching? You can't really PROVE the cheating. That's why there are rules, the rule is usually, keep your eyes on your own paper at your own desk, otherwise it will be assumed you cheated. You don't need to prove the cheating - just that the rules were broken.

      In this election, there were MANY rules broken.

      Delete
    6. How to know when cheating has occurred is easy in this eIection.....the Dems are so used to cheating they bareIy worried about being caught; and it is easy to see why. The media refuses to report on the obvious fraud; and aII the anaIysis done to date. The refuse to give credence to those who swore affadavits. The courts refuse to Iook at the evidence, and the Dems have been caught on camera stuffing baIIot boxes.....evidence is there apIenty.

      When I was in University, Asian students were often found cheating. No one saw them do it...no one reported them doing it, but we aII know they did it. How? SimpIe.

      Many of them couId bareIy speak EngIish, but when the essays were due, these Chinese students turned in grammatically perfect work - probIem is, they often used the same service so the papers were often identicaI. How did the asian students get away with it....and why were they not worried about getting caught? SimpIe. The students knew the professors wouId not do anything about it because China pays a crap Ioad of money to the schooIs in Canada......and the University facuIty Iike nice furniture and the perks that come with that.

      if the kind of peopIe who cheat, do cheat; get caught, and get punished for it......they stop cheating. If the kind of peopIe cheat, get caught and know they can stiII get away with it....they wiII cheat.





      Delete
  3. Its time to declare martial law and imprison the SC justices for dereliction of duty and disdain of the constitution of the United States.
    They just struck down voter id laws.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, in Kansas. Kansas law was you have to prove citizenship. SC found they could not make that law in the state of kansas.

      Delete
  4. SCOTUS is allowing the pressure to build. The delusional Biden bunch will start a war when they're slapped down.
    Hurry up! I've been pushed enough.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You ask "Help stop the spread of fake news" and then post something that is the epitome of fake news?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don’t see how a legit case is fake news ??

      Delete
    2. Not fake news (sorry) I wish it WAS fake news. We need to unite here - this isn't "right" v/s "left" - it is far more serious.

      Delete
  6. SCOTUS are cowards that let roberts brow beat them into submission and will not take up this case or any others except to usurp the constitution on election laws. Our constitution is dead unless the conservatives grow a pair but like I said, they're cowards!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Justice Roberts is political and influenced by his liberal wife. He fears the riots that will take place should the election is overturned.

      Delete
    2. Justice Roberts is political and controled by his liberal wife.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. In the United States of America you only have standing if you hate America, hate the constitution, hate traditional Americans, or hate God. If you don't fit in that criteria don't bother filing any law suits!!!

      Delete
  8. all well and good until the SCOTUS comes back with "but you don't have standing"
    then its time to lock & load

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thursday December 17, 2020 8:42 AM

    Today, Dr. Peter K. Navarro released a new report which provides a comprehensive, objective assessment of the fairness and integrity of the 2020 election, obtained through evidence including more than 50 lawsuits around the nation, thousands of affidavits and testimonies, published analyses, media reports, and more.
    https://populist.press/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-Immaculate-Deception-12.15.20-1.pdf

    Dr. Navarro will be hosting a press briefing call today at 1:00 PM EST in his capacity as a private citizen to discuss his findings. (We will stream live right here in this article)
    https://populist.press/explosive-navarro-report-immaculate-deception-six-key-dimensions-of-election-irregularities/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cute how he plays against Mother Mary in the "title" of his report. I am a lapsed Catholic/ amd find that title very offensive. It won't help his case -

      Delete
  10. The evidence of voter fraud is obvious to anyone with an open mind. The Supreme Court (justice Roberts) is unwilling to toss aside his political beliefs and fear of social pressure. If he can’t bring himself to upholding the constitution and his oath of office he and the other left wing justices should resign. As Harry Truman once said “If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen “!

    ReplyDelete
  11. What reason will the supreme court deep stater's use to deny the hundred of thousands of items indicating voter fraud, then say there's no proof!!??

    ReplyDelete
  12. It used to be, that Traitors of The United States were hung publicly. Its time to bring that back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately, Trump will be the first to go

      Delete
  13. And will she have "standing" to bring the case, or will SCOTUS use that as an out again to avoid the case?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, SCOTUS will avoid the case like the COVID

      Delete
  14. John Roberts cant get to it until he comes back from his trip on the lolital express.

    ReplyDelete
  15. This is ridiculous. It is over but these responsible agencies keep putting this nonsense out there helping to fuel the people that aren't the smartest in society. They are taking advantage of the people with lower IQs and it is disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I can’t believe the cry of “where’s the evidence” after the Steele dossier debacle, but guess what - slipshod hare-brained cases don’t wind up on the Supreme Court docket. If you want to hear the evidence, well good news it’s going to be presented. As for the court refusing to hear the Texas case based on a technicality, people are overreacting to that. That case WASN’T the be-all end-all blockbuster case that THIS case might be. All it addressed were some states unconstitutionally (in violation of their own state constitutions) changing their election rules to allow for millions of mail-in ballots to be mailed out that shouldn’t have been. It didn’t address the receiving, verifying, and counting of those ballots, and it had zero to do with electronic/computer manipulation of the data. I’m not a lawyer but maybe it isn’t actually Texas’s place to say how another state makes its election RULES, whether it violates the other states constitution or not, is that Texas’ business? On the other hand, actual fraudulent tallying of votes (which that case WASN’T about) is a completely different story. THIS case (and many others still out there) is about the actual fraud - not how the rules were changed to allow the fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The fix is in. When the Supreme Court refuses to hear cases where it is publicly known and documenible fact that the Executive and Judicial Branches usurped the authority of the Legislative Branch, contrary to the US Constitution, you know your goose is cooked.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Trump and his doddering team are the biggest spreaders of fake news

    ReplyDelete